QUALITY OF INSTITUTIONS IN CANDIDATE AND POTENTIAL CANDIDATE COUNTRIES COMPARED TO THE NEWEST EUROPEAN MEMBERS

Authors

  • Jelena Trivić Faculty of Economics, University of Banja Luka Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7251/ZREFIS2122023T

Keywords:

institutions, world governance indicators, corruption, rule of law, transition, European Union

Abstract

This paper deals with the quality of institutions in two samples. The first sample consists of candidates and potential candidates for membership in the European Union - Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia and N. Macedonia, while the second sample consists of the youngest member states of the European Union - Croatia, Bulgaria and Romania. In some of the earlier papers, as a co-author or author, I compared the countries of the region with the members of "New Europe", i.e. the countries that became members of the EU in 2004, but a glance look at the data today led me to the conclusion that the quality of the institutional environment in the region is more logical to compare with the newest EU members. Even in comparison with these countries, our region lags significantly behind. As a database for the quality of institutions, I used the World Governance Indicators developed by Kaufman et al. (2010). Institutions are defined as they were defined by Nobel laureate Douglas North and after him, a whole group of economists under the auspices of the New Institutional Economy.

References

Acemoglu, Daron and James Robinson. 2010. ‘’The Role of Institutions in Growth and Development.’’ Review of Economics and Institutions 1(2):1-33. DOI:10.5202/rei.v1i2.1

Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson and James Robinson. 2004. ‘’Institutions as the fundamentals cause of long-run growth.’’ NBER Working Paper 10481.

Campos, Nauro. 2000. ‘’Context is everything: Measuring institutional change in transition economies.’’ Policy Research Working Paper 2269.

Dollar, David and Aart Kraay. 2003. ‘’Institutions, Trade, and Growth.’’ Policy Research Working Paper No. 3004.

Efendic, Adnan, Geoff Pugh and Nick Adnett. 2010. ‘’Institutions and economic performance: System GMM modelling of institutional effects in transition.’’ On-line publication: AAB-RIINVEST University in Pristina, Kosovo* UNMIK 1244UN 20th December. http://www.riinvestinstitute.org/pdf/Efendic_et_al.pd.

Fischer, Stanley and Alan Gelb. 1991. ‘’The Process of Socialist Economic Transformation.’’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(4): 91-105.

Fischer, Stanley and Ratna Sahay. 2004. Transition Economies: The Role of Institutions and Initial Conditions. IMF. Preliminary Draft.

Hall, Robert E. and Charles I. Jones. 1998. ‘’Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others.’’ NBER Working Paper 6564.

Kaufman, Daniel, Aart Kraay and Massimo Mastruzzi. 2010. ‘’The Worldwide Governance Indicators Methodology and Analytical Issues.’’ Policy Research Working Papers 5430.

Knack, Stephen and Philip Keefer. 1995. ‘’Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross Country Test Using Alternative Institutional Measures.’’ Economics and Politics 7(3): 208-227.

Kolodko, Grzegorz W. 1999. ‘’Transition to a market economy and sustained growth. Implications for the post-Washington consensus.’’ Communist and Post-Communist Studies 32: 233-261.

La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer and Robert Vishny. 1998. "The Quality of Goverment," NBER Working Papers 6727.

Yifu Lin, Justin and Nugent, Jeffrey B. 1995. "Institutions and economic development," In Handbook of Development Economics, edited by Hollis Chenery & T.N. Srinivasan, 2301-2370. Elsevier.

Murrell, Peter. 2003. ‘’Institutions and Firms in Transition Economies.’’ Draft Prepared as a chapter of the Handbook Of New Institutional Economics. ed dited by Claude Ménard and Mary Shirley, Kluwer Academic Press, forthcoming.

North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Popov, Vladimir. 2007. ‘’Shock Therapy versus Gradualism Reconsidered: Lessons from Transition Economies after 15 Years of Reforms.’’ Comparative Economic Studies 49: 1–31.

Rodrik, Dani, Arvind Subramanian and Francessco Trebbi. 2002. ‘’Institutions Rule: The primacy of Institutions Over Geography and Integration in Economic Development.’’ NBER Workin Paper 9305.

Roland, Gerard. 2002. ‘’The Political Economy of Transition. Journal of Economic Perspectives.’’ 16(1): 29–50.

Streeten, Paul. 1996. ‘’Governance. in: Quibria.’’ In Current Issues in Economic Development. An Asian Perspective. edited by Quibria M. G. and Malcom J Dowling, 27-66. Oxford University Press.

Svejnar, Jan. 2002. ‘’Transition Economies: Performance and Challenges.’’ The Journal of Economic Perspectives 16(1): 3-28.

Trivic, Jelena. and Saša Petkovic. 2014. ‘’Institutions and institutional environment in candidate and potential candidates – how far are we?’’ In Proceedings of the international scientific conference Old and New World Order – Between European Integrations and Historical Burnings: perspectives and Challenges for Europe of 21st Century editet by Dimitrijevic, Duško. 458-472. Belgrade: Institute of International Economics and Politics Belgrade and Hans Seidel Foundation Munich

Trivić, Jelena and Saša Petković. 2015. ‘’Different Features of Transition Economies-Institutional Matter.’’ In Family Businesses in Transition Economies. Management, Succession and Internationalization editet by Dana, Leo Paul and Veland Ramadani, 71-96. New York, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London: Springer International Publishing.

Klimczak, Łucas and Jelena Trivić. 2018. ‘’Institutions and Intra-Regional Trade in CEFTA 2006: A Gravity Approach.’’ Proceedings of the Faculty of Economics in East Sarajevo 17: 11-25.

World Bank. 1994. Governance. The World Bank's Experience. Washington DC.

World Bank. 1998. Beyond the Washington Consensus: Institutions Matter. Washington DC.

World Governance Indicators Database. 2020. Accessed 20th December. Official web page http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/

Downloads

Published

2021-06-15

Issue

Section

Original scientific paper

How to Cite

QUALITY OF INSTITUTIONS IN CANDIDATE AND POTENTIAL CANDIDATE COUNTRIES COMPARED TO THE NEWEST EUROPEAN MEMBERS. (2021). Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta U Istočnom Sarajevu, 22, 23-33. https://doi.org/10.7251/ZREFIS2122023T