ECONOMIC GROWTH MODEL FOR BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA IN THE PERIOD 2007-2017 - OPPORTUNITIES FOR FUTURE RISKS REDUCTION -
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7251/ZREFIS1918061SKeywords:
Econometrics, Capital, Modeling of Quantitative Policies, SimulationAbstract
The theory of the system indicates that the metastable state (state of the system described as a state which is close to the equilibrium state) will go into equilibrium if we wait long enough. The behavior of a particular system in the future depends on historical events, current and future shocks. In the equilibrium, all participants in economic life - economic agents are satisfied with their position, and economists call this a state of Nash equilibrium. The problem that we will deal with is the question of whether the economy of Bosnia and Herzegovina is in equilibrium, how to measure equilibrium, how to achieve stability and the balance of the system. The research will focus on productivity function for BiH, the concept of a potential gross domestic product, deviations in the nominal gross domestic product from the potential. We will analyze aggregate demand with the aim to define the model of economic growth of Bosnia and Herzegovina. We believe this knowledge will provide a basis that we believe can serve to create instruments, measures and policies that are needed to reduce future risks - deviations in economic growth.References
Abiad, Abdul, John Bluedorn, Jaime Guajardo, and Petia Topalova, 2014. “Resilience in Emerging Market and Developing Economies: Will It Last?’’ World Economic Outlook IV: 129 -71
Batini, Nicoletta, Luc Eyraud, Lorenzo Forni, and Anke Weber. 2014. “Fiscal Multipliers: Size, Determinants, and Use in Macroeconomic Projections”. IMF Technical Notes and Manuals TNM 14/04.
Bornhorst, Fabian, Annalisa Fedelino, Jan Gottschalk, and Gabriela Dobrescu. 2011. When and How to Adjust Beyond the Business Cycle? A Guide to Structural Fiscal Balances. Washington: IMF
Dabla-Norris, Era, Giang Ho, and Annette Kyobo. 2016. “Structural Reforms and Productivity Growth in Emerging Market and Developing Economies” IMF Working Paper 16/15.
Federal Reserve Bank of St-Louis. 2009. Projecting Potential Growth: Issues and Measurement, Special Issue on Potential Output Growth and Output Gap, Washington: IMF
Ghazanchyan, Manuk and Janet Stotsky. 2013. “Drivers of Growth: Evidence from Sub-Saharan African Countries”, IMF Working Paper 13/236.
GSR RS. 2017. Bilans stanja konsolidovanog izvještaja korisnika budžeta Republike Srpske Acessed Jun 17 http://www.gsr-rs.org/static/uploads/report_attachments/2017/08/18/RI028-17_Cyr.pdf
Hlivnjak, Sandra, and Matija Laco. 2018. ‘’Bosnia and Herzegovina: calculation of cyclically adjusted budget balance and assessment of fiscal policy stance ‘’discussion paper 3. Washington: World Bank Group.
IMF 2017. Acessed Jun 15 https://www.imf.org/external/np/fad/publicinvestment/pdf/csupdate_jan17.pdf
IMF. 2010. The IMF-FSB Early Warning Exercise: Design and Methodological Toolkit. Washington: IMF
IMF. 2015. Guidance Note for Surveillance under Article IV Consultation Washington: IMF
IMF. 2016. IMF Staff Note for the G20-A Guiding Framework for Structural Reforms. Washington: IMF
Krajišnik, Stevanović. 2018. "Debt sustainability dynamics for the countries in the region - an example of the analysis of the debt sustainability for BiH". Financing IX (2)
Lebrun, Igor, and Esther Pérez Ruiz. 2014. “Demand Patterns in France, Germany, and Belgium: Can We Explain the Differences?” IMF Working Paper 14/165.
Stevanović, Saša. 2018. "Macroeconomic Indicators of Republika Srpska" Financing IX (3)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Istočnom Sarajevu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
