COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MANAGEMENT MODEL IN EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7251/ZREFIS1408067MKeywords:
unemployment, employment services, performance managementAbstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the practice of monitoring the effects of selected employment services across Europe, as well as the identification of key elements, with the aim of encouraging the dissemination of good practice between employment services. The research aims to launch a professional discussion in Bosnia and Herzegovina, where there is no system to monitor the performance of employment services. The organization of employment services in the majority of cases reflects the constitutional order and the achieved level of decentralization. In order to comprehend all quality models, the comparative analysis included the following countries: Austria, Germany (services are provided at state and municipal levels), Switzerland (federal system), Belgium (regional regulation) and Denmark (services are provided exclusively at the local level). Although the goals are set in different ways from country to country, measuring the effects in all countries becomes an imperative of the service, in order to obtain accurate data on the activities that produce results. Both quantitative and qualitative tools are used to measure and manage the effects. Quantitative methods give more reliable information about the results because they exclude the impact of external factors (beyond the control of the service) on the final outcome. However, qualitative analyses are needed to identify which elements of individual practices are especially important for customers and for its success.References
Ecorys. 2012. PES performance measurement systems and geographical labour mobility: Final Report. London and Rotterdam: Ecorys.
European Commission. 2012a. Performance Management in Public Employment Services. PES-2-PES Mutual Learning Programme. Brussels, Author: Alex Nunn
European Commission. 2012b. Public Employment Services’ Contribution to EU 2020: PES 2020 Strategy Output Paper. Brussels: European Commission DG Employment.
European Commission. 2012c. PES to PES Dialogue Report 2012 Dissemination Conference: Results from the second year of the PES to PES Dialogue programme. Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. 2012d. Evaluation of Labour Market Policies and Programmes: the use of data-driven analysis – Germany. Brussels: PES-2-PES Mutual Learning Programme.
European Commission. 2012e. Evaluation of Labour Market Policies and Programmes: the use of data-driven analysis – Denmark. Brussels: PES-2-PES Mutual Learning Programme.
European Commission. 2012f. Evaluation of Labour Market Policies and Programmes: the use of data-driven analysis – Austria. Brussels: PES-2-PES Mutual Learning Programme.
European Commission. 2012g. Evaluation of Labour Market Policies and Programmes: the use of data-driven analysis – Italy. Brussels: PES-2-PES Mutual Learning Programme.
European Commission. 2013a. Peer PES Paper, Peer Review “Peer Review on Performance Management in Public Employment Services (PES)”. February 2013, Arbeitsmarktservice Österreich (AMS Austria).
European Commission. 2013b. Peer PES Paper, Peer Review “Peer Review on Performance Management in Public Employment Services (PES)”. February 2013, Bundesagentur für Arbeit (BA).
European Commission. 2013c. Peer PES Paper, Peer Review “Peer Review on Performance Management in Public Employment Services (PES)”. February 2013, VDAB – Flemish Public Employment and Vocational Training services.
European Commission. 2013d. Review of Performance Management in Public Employment Services. Peer Review Comparative Paper, PES-2-PES Mutual Learning Programme. Brussels, March 2013, Author: Alex Nunn.
European Commission. 2013e. Peer PES Paper, Peer Review “Peer Review on Performance Management in Public Employment Services (PES)”. March 2013. State Secretariat for Economic Affairs – SECO (Switzerland).
Newton, Becci, Christine Meager, Nigel Bertram, Anne Corden, Anitha George, Mumatz Lalani, Hilary Metcalf, Hilary, Heather Rolfe, Roy Sainsburyand and Katharine Weston. 2012. Work Programme evaluation: Findings from the first phase of qualitative research on programme delivery. Norwich: DWP.
Ured za reviziju institucija u FBiH. 2012. Izvještaj revizije učinka: Upravljanje Programom zapošljavanja mladih Sarajevo. Broj:07-14-5-993-3/12. Pristupljeno 25. septembar http://vrifbih.ba/javni-izvj/ucinak/pdf/Izvj_RU_Upravlj_Progr_zaposl_mladih_bos.pdf.
Weishaupt, Timo. 2010. Governing Public Employment Services: Recent Trends in Social Partnership and Privatization. University of Mannheim. Pristupljeno 25. septembar http://umdcipe.org/conferences/LaborActivationParis/Papers/Weishaupt_GoverningPES_Nov_2_2011.pdf.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Istočnom Sarajevu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.