STREAMLINING CONSTRUCTION: MAXIMIZING EFFICIENCY THROUGH EFFECTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT: THEORETICAL REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7251/ZREFIS2429063BKeywords:
Construction, Environmental accounting, Sustainable development, Waste managementAbstract
The construction boom in Albania after the '90s had a significant impact on the country's economy. It brought about rapid urbanization, job creation, and increased investment opportunities. The construction sector became a major contributor to GDP growth, attracting both domestic and foreign investments. It also stimulated demand for various industries, such as manufacturing and services, leading to overall economic development. With increased construction activities, there was a rise in construction waste generation. This highlighted the need for effective waste management practices to minimize environmental impact.Waste management is a crucial aspect of construction projects, yet it hasn't received as much emphasis as in other industries. This paper aims to highlight the importance of waste management in construction and the need for effective strategies to minimize waste.In the construction industry, waste refers to any material, energy, or time that is not utilized efficiently and adds no value to the project. Construction waste can include excess materials, unused resources, inefficient processes, and environmental damage. The presence of waste in construction not only leads to financial losses but also has negative environmental and social impacts. This paper presents a review on studies that have systematically investigated the occurrence of waste in the construction industry, including concepts adopted, metrics, and type of feedback provided relating to efficiency improvementReferences
Abd Rashid, A. F., & Yusoff, S. (2015). A review of life cycle assessment method for building industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, 244–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.043
Bartl, Andreas. 2014. “Ways and Entanglements of the Waste Hierarchy.” Waste Management 34 (1): 1–2.
Cabeza, L. F., Rincón, L., Vilariño, V., Pérez, G., & Castell, A. (2014). Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, 394–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.037
Ceryes, Caitlin A., Cassandra C. Antonacci, Susan A. Harvey, Margo L. Spiker, Arielle Bickers, and Roni A. Neff. 2021. “Maybe It’s Still Good? A Qualitative Study of Factors Influencing Food Waste and Application of the EPA Food Recovery Hierarchy in US Supermarkets.” Appetite 161: 105111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105111.
Cole, Chris, Anthony Gnanapragasam, Tim Cooper, and Jagdeep Singh. 2019. “An Assessment of Achievements of the WEEE Directive in Promoting Movement Up the Waste Hierarchy: Experiences in the UK.” Waste Management 87: 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.029.
European Commission. 1975. Directive 75/445/EEC of 26 June 1975 Amending Directive No 66/404/EEC on the Marketing of Forest Reproductive Material.
European Commission. 1991. Directive 91/156/EEC of 18 March 1991 Amending Directive 75/442/EEC on Waste.
European Commission. 2008. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on Waste and Repealing Certain Directives.
Gharfalkar, Manisha, Ruth Court, Cathy Campbell, Zainab Ali, and Graham Hillier. 2015. “Analysis of Waste Hierarchy in the European Waste Directive 2008/98/EC.” Waste Management 39: 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.02.007.
Hendriks, Christiaan Frederik, and Bertus Johannes Hendrik Te Dorsthorst.. 2001. “Re-use of Constructions at Different Levels: Construction, Element or Material.” In CIB World Building Congress, 1–11, April.
INSTAT 2022. Mbetjet e Ngurta Urbane, www.instat.gov.al
Kotaji, S., Schuurmans, A., & Edwards, S. (2003). Life-cycle Assessment in Building and Construction: A State-of-the-art Report, 2003. SETAC.
Muluken YeheyisKasun N. HewageKasun N. HewageM. Shahria AlamM. Shahria AlamRehan SadiqRehan Sadiq 2012. An overview of construction and demolition waste management in Canada: A lifecycle analysis approach to sustainability • • 10.1007/s10098-012-0481-6
Sakai, Shin-ichi, Hideaki Yoshida, Yasuhiko Hirai, Masako Asari, Hiroshi Takigami, Shuji Takahashi, et al. 2011. “International Comparative Study of 3R and Waste Management Policy Developments.” Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 13: 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-011-0009-x.
Sharma, A., Saxena, A., Sethi, M., Shree, V., & Varun. (2011). Life cycle assessment of buildings: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(1), 871–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.008
Yeheyis, M., Hewage, K., Alam, M. S., Eskicioglu, C., & Sadiq, R. (2012). An overview of construction and demolition waste management in Canada: A lifecycle analysis approach to sustainability. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-012-0481-6
Zero Waste Europe. 2019. “A Zero Waste Hierarchy for Europe.” May. https://zerowasteeurope.eu/2019/05/a-zero-waste-hierarchy-for-europe/.
Zhang, C., Hu, M., Di Maio, F., Sprecher, B., Yang, X., & Tukker, A. (2022). An overview of the waste hierarchy framework for analyzing the circularity in construction and demolition waste management in Europe. Science of The Total Environment, 803, 149892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149892
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Istočnom Sarajevu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
