TESTING KALDOR’S FACT: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

Predrag Trpeski; Kristijan Kozheski; Gunter Merdzan; Marijana Cvetanoska Mitev

doi:10.7251/ZREFIS2327037T

Authors

Predrag Trpeski Faculty of Economics Skopje, University “Ss. Cyril and Methodius” in Skopje Author
Kristijan Kozheski Faculty of Economics Skopje, University “Ss. Cyril and Methodius” in Skopje Author
Gunter Merdzan Faculty of Economics Skopje, University “Ss. Cyril and Methodius” in Skopje Author
Marijana Cvetanoska Mitev Faculty of Economics Skopje, University “Ss. Cyril and Methodius” in Skopje Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7251/ZREFIS2327037T

Keywords:

distribution of income, national income, labor productivity, GDP

Abstract

This paper discusses the functional distribution of income, as a consequence of decoupling phenomenon between workers’ compensation and labor productivity. This issue has been observed since the mid-1970s in most developed economies, resulting in a trend of decreasing labor income in national income or GDP. Despite conventional economic theory predicting a proportional increase in workers’ income with increases in labor productivity, empirical results suggest that this relationship is not being realized. The study analyzes the distribution of labor income and capital income in relation to GDP in European countries, in order to gain insight into the conditions and trends of labor income and to evaluate the functional distribution of income at the level of an individual country. The paper provides a detailed analysis of labor share on the example of all countries in Europe and compares countries to determine the direction and degree of trend of the labor share. The results highlight the need for further research on this topic and provide insight into the factors contributing to the decoupling of productivity from workers’ compensation.

References

Arellano, Manuel, and Olympia Bover. “Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Components Models.” Journal of Econometrics 68, no. 1 (1995): 29–51. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-d.

Baker, Dean. 2007. The Productivity to Paycheck Gap: What the Data Show. London: Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR).

Bentolila, Samuel, and Gilles Saint-Paul. “Explaining Movements in the Labor Share.” Contributions in Macroeconomics 3, no. 1 (2003). doi:10.2202/1534-6005.1103.

Bivens, Josh, and Lawrence Mishel. 2015. Understanding the Historic Divergence between Productivity and a Typical Worker’s Pay: Why it Matters and Why it’s Real. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.

European Commission, 2017a. Annual Growth Survey 2018: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Central Bank, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank, Brussels: s.n. Luxembourg

European commission, 2017b. European Economic Forecast, Brussels: s.n. Luxembourg

Harrison, Ann. “Has Globalization Eroded Labor’s Share? Some Cross-Country Evidence.” World Scientific Studies in International Economics, 2022, 89–135. doi:10.1142/9789811239472_0005.

Karabarbounis, Loukas, and Brent Neiman. 2013. ‘’The Global Decline of the Labor Share.’’ National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper. 19136. doi:10.3386/w19136.

Pasimeni, Paolo. 2018. The Relation between Productivity and Compensation in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union

Patra, S Sudhakar, and Satya Ranjan Nayak. 2012.’’ A Theoretical Study on the Relationship between Wages and Labor Productivities in Industries.’’ International Journal of Economics and Research 1(3): 157-163.

World of Work Report, 2014: Developing with jobs. Inter National Labour Organization Research Department Geneva.