THE INFLUENCE OF COLONIALISM ON THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE NEWLY INDUSTRIALIZED ASIAN COUNTRIES

Dejana Gajinov

doi:10.7251/ZREFIS2327071G

Authors

Dejana Gajinov Moscow Academy of Economics and Law, Moscow, Russian Federation Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7251/ZREFIS2327071G

Keywords:

Asian newly industrialized countries, colonialism, Japan's Asian policy, Japanese developmental colonialism, Cultivation system, Ethical policy

Abstract

Since the 1980s, a widespread view has arisen in the literature that the economic success, known as the Economic Miracle, of Taiwan and the Republic of Korea since the 1960s has been due, in part at least, to the legacy of Japanese colonialism, but also that the region of East/Southeast Asia was generally more fortunate than other colonized countries, because especially Japanese, even Dutch and American, and British colonialism were more or less developmental. That is, they laid the foundations for the future growth and development of the newly industrialized Asian countries. This paper attempts to determine the actual extent of the contribution of each, comparing the Japanese economic achievements in both Taiwan and Korea with those of (primarily) the Dutch, then Americans, British, Spanish and Portuguese in their East/Southeast Asian colonies. The paper examines the record of economic growth, development of agriculture and industry, infrastructure and all structural changes across the colonies and dependent territories. It also discusses policies related to government revenue and expenditure, and trade. The paper also looks at some non-monetary indicators related to living standards, including education. The main conclusion is that the facts do not wholly support the case of Japanese developmental colonialism but that there are drastic differences in the colonial legacy among the colonizing countries of the East/Southeast Asian region. Also, what is indisputable is that every colonizer, including Japan, primarily thought about their interests and not about the development interests of their colony.

References

Zagoria, Donald, and James C. Abegglen. 1994. “Sea Change: Pacific Asia as the New World Industrial Center.” Foreign Affairs 73 (2): 170. doi:10.2307/20045997.

Booth, Anne. 2007. ‘’Did It Really Help To Be a Japanese Colony? East Asian Economic Performance in Historical Perspective.’’ The Asia Pacific Journal: Japan Focus 5(5): 1-26.

Cumings, Bruce. 1998. ‘’The Corean Crisis and the End of Late Development.’’ New Left Review 0 (231): 43-72.

Dick, Howard, Vincent J. H. Houben, Thomas J Lindblad, Kian Wie Thee. 2002. The Emergence of a National Economy: An Economic History of Indonesia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Gajinov, Dejana. 2023. Privredno čudo zemalja Istočne i Jugoistočne Azije I-III. Beograd.

Haggard, Stephan, David Kang, and Chung-In Moon. 1997. “Japanese Colonialism and Korean Development: A Critique.” World Development 25 (6): 867–81. doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(97)00012-0.

Hilgerdt, Folke. 1943. ‘’The Case for Multilateral Trade.’’ The American Economic Review 33(1): Part 2.

Hori, Kazuo. 1994. ‘’East Asia Between the Two World Wars: Industrialization of Japan and Its Ex-Colonies’’, Kyoto University Economic Revue 64(2) 1-22.

Hsiao, Frank S., and Mei-Chu W. Hsiao. 2005. “Colonialism, Learning and Convergence: A Comparison of India and Taiwan.” Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 10 (2): 146–77. doi:10.1080/13547860500071394.

Kohli, Atul 1994. ‘’Where Do High Growth Political Economies Come From? The Japanese Lineage of Korea's Developmental State.’’ World Development 22 (9):1269-93.

Korthals Altes, W.L. 1991. Changing Economy of Indonesia 12a. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute.

Maddison, Angus. 2003. Shi Jie Jing Ji Qian Nian Shi = The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective. Beijing Shi: Beijing da xue chu ban she.

Mizoguchi, Toshiyuki, and Mataji Umemura. 1988. Kyū Nihon Shokuminchi Keizai Tōkei: Suikei to Bunseki. Tōkyō: Tōyō Keizai Shinpōsha.

Morgan, Stephen L., and Shiyung Liu. 2007. “Was Japanese Colonialism Good for the Welfare of Taiwanese? Stature and the Standard of Living.” The China Quarterly 192: 990–1013. doi:10.1017/s0305741007002135.

Morris, Morris D. 1963. ‘’Towards a Reinterpretation of Nineteenth Century Indian Economic History’’ Journal of Economic History 23 (4): 606-18.

Myers, Ramon and Saburo Yamada 1984. Agricultural Development In the Empire In The Japanese Colonial Empire 1895-1945, edited by Myers, Ramon H. and Mark R. Peattie, Princeton: Princeton University Press

Nakao, Shigeo. 1997. ‘’Booming Asia Reconsidered.’’ Osaka City University Economic Review 32,(1-2): 52-75.

Ogura, Kazuo. 1996. ‘’Japan’s Asia Policy, Past and Future.’’ Japan Review of International Affairs 10(1): 3-15.

Peattie, Mark R. 1984. Introduction In The Japanese Colonial Empire 1895–1945, edited by Ramon H. Myers and Mark R. Peattie,. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Zniderš̌ič, Martin. 1986. Atlas Svjetske Povijesti. Ljubljana: Cankarjeva Zalozba.

Thorbecke, Erik. 1979. Agricultural Development In Economic Growth and Structural Change in Taiwan, edited by Walter Galenson, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Tsurumi, E. Patricia. 1984. Colonial Education in Korea and Taiwan In The Japanese Colonial Empire 1895-1945, edited by Myers, Ramon H. and Mark R. Peattie, Princeton: Princeton University Press

Van der Eng, Pierre. 1992. ‘’The Real Domestic Product of Indonesia 1880–1989.’’ Explorations in Economic History 29(3): 343-373.